Endosemiosis, a domain of study often confined to micro-level semiotic processes within organisms, has been somewhat neglected in its potential connection to broader dimensions of social semiotics and cultural discourse. Nevertheless, recent developments in endosemiotic inquiry, particularly in conjunction with the frameworks of psychosomatic medicine as articulated by Thure von Uexküll (1993), further expanded upon by Favareau (2009), and other scholars within the realm of biosemiotics, have begun to illuminate its significance. This research proposes an exploration into a sensitive and often taboo subject: miscarriage within the body of pregnant individuals and the intricate decision-making processes that underlie it. Firstly, the phenomenon of miscarriage, an involuntary event within the realm of endosemiosis, remains inadequately discussed within contemporary societal and cultural narratives. Secondly, deliberate abortion processes provoke extensive discourse across various strata of social and cultural reception, often influenced by institutional policies concerning reproductive rights. Thirdly, there exists a notable dearth of comprehensive understanding regarding the interconnection between these two phenomena. In this context, endosemiotics presents a promising avenue for elucidating the social and cultural dimensions of the diverse decision-making processes inherent in the experiences of individuals capable of childbirth. By integrating insights from endosemiotic inquiry with broader socio-cultural analyses, this study aims to contribute to a more nuanced comprehension of the complex dynamics surrounding reproductive choices and their societal implications.References:Favareau, D. (2009). Endosemiosis. Essential Readings in Biosemiotics: Anthology and Commentary, 279-321.Von Uexküll, T., Geigges, W., & Herrmann, J. M. (1993). Endosemiosis. Semiotica 96 (1-2), 5-52