Over the past three decades, feminism has catalyzed a revolution prompting a fundamental shift in the theoretical underpinnings across fields of knowledge. While feminist discourse has deeply influenced scientific disciplines, the field of semiotics appears to have been marginally touched by its impact. This oversight is not merely a matter of gender; rather, it reflects a broader theoretical lacuna, necessitating a reexamination of the discipline's foundational assumptions. The neglect of gender issues within semiotics stems not from the traditionally higher male presence in its upper echelons, but rather from inherently theoretical reasons. While feminism fundamentally redefines notions of subject and subjectivity, envisioning diverse forms of meaning, semiotics has traditionally grappled with the abstract and universal Subject, disembodied and generic, neglecting corporeal, sexual, and affective dimensions. My paper, thus, aims to explore the possibility of introducing variants into our theoretical paradigm to address questions of subjectivity, gender, and corporeality more comprehensively. Through an interrogation of semiotic theory's treatment of subjectivity, a primar locus of inquiry emerges: the enunciation theory. The concept of enunciative practice, although not explicitly referencing gender differences, offers a framework to problematize the relationship between singular enunciation and the cultural backdrop enabling it. It elucidates how social codes and established discourses reflect and converge in "habits," predisposing individuals to action. Following this proposal, through an interdisciplinary dialogue and a critical engagement with feminist thought, I seek to enrich the disciplinary perspective, opening new avenues for research and interpretation.