AbstractJean-Claude Coquet distinguishes phusis and logos, the transition from one to the other being ensured by the articulation between capture and recapture. Our proposal consists, in this perspective, of specifying the role of experience, and of giving a more detailed account of enunciation, as a process linking together a series of translations-transpositions. This process would be particularly related to what Greimas called enunciative praxis.This proposal aims to broaden the perspective of a reflection about the articulation between reality and enunciation in Jean-Claude Coquet, by suggesting in particular the relevance and compatibility of theoretical solutions developed in other types of semiotics, Lotmanian and Peircian. Lotman, for example, defines the semiosphere as the theoretical place where semiotic experience receives its conditions of existence and relevance, which allow it to develop languages. In Lotman as in Pierce (and even, in his own way, in Greimas), the phase transitions which lead to semiosis are conceived as translations, transpositions and transduction. When the relationship with reality is mediated by experimental devices, exploration and visualization techniques, and algorithms, this contribution proves essential.Provisionally, as a working hypothesis and hoped-for result of this research, we wish to develop the practical process of enunciation in the form of a sequence, which could be this:[Reflection → Exploration → Expression → Transmission → Modification ]